03) Peer review process

Articles or information submitted exclusively to brainybuzz publication hub undergo peer review process. Manuscripts not meeting the scientific standards will not be considered for the reviewing process. Editors request referees to advice on the scientific merit as well as the likely appeal since, the paper will have for broad readership. Editors usually give reviewers 21 days to complete their review process. Although editors always hope for a quick turnaround, this is not always possible. However, editors will be in contact with the referees once paper is sent to them, with weekly reminders of their due date. Once all the reviews are in-house, the Editor handling the manuscript will most likely make a decision within a day or two. The editor will then contact the corresponding author with the decision. The entire review process of the articles submitted to brainybuzz publication hub are done online. Reviewers invest precious time in the belief that they are making important contributions to the scientific process. Author’s criticism or negative comments on reviewer’s comments will be subjected to the cancellation of publication.

 

Submission & Peer Review Process

  • Author submits all required materials, including copyright form, and separate cover letter via email.
  • Completed submission is sent out to two or three reviewers.
  • Reviewers review the article and send it back to the editorial office for processing.
  • After initial review, Editor-in-Chief releases reviews to authors.
  • Authors are asked to respond to reviewers and make necessary corrections.
  • Article is sent out for re-review.
  • Editor-in-Chief may accept, reject, accept with minor alterations, or sent out for third review.
  • Prior to publication, publisher will send galleys to authors. No edits may be made after galleys are approved.
  • Printed in brainybuzz publication hub journals.

 

Editorial Policy

Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that the authors have not violated any ethical practice followed in preparation and publication of manuscripts. Author/s is/are responsible for all the statements made in their work and should be willing to defend them publicly, if challenged. Authors should prepare their manuscripts submitted to the journal exactly according to the instructions given. Manuscripts which do not follow the format and style of the journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication. Manuscripts and figures are not returned to the authors, not even upon rejection of the paper.

 

Duties of Editors

Publication decision

Fair play

Confidentiality

Disclosure and Conflicts of interest

Involvement and cooperation in investigations

 

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decision

Promptness

Confidentiality

Standards of Objectivity

Acknowledgement of Source

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

 

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Data Access and Retention

Originality and Plagiarism

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

Acknowledgement of Sources

Authorship of the Paper

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Fundamental errors in published works

 

Plagiarism Detection

The peer review process is at the heart of the success of scientific publishing. As part of our commitment to the protection and enhancement of the peer review process, Journal has an obligation to assist the scientific community in all aspects of publishing ethics, especially in cases of (suspected) duplicate submission or plagiarism.